Corrections Policy
What to do if you spot an error in our reporting, and how we respond.
Our standard
Mindiam corrects factual errors promptly, visibly, and on the original page. We do not silently rewrite history. When a published piece changes materially after the fact, we record what changed and why, immediately below the byline.
How to report a correction
Email corrections@mindiam.com with:
- The URL of the piece
- The specific claim or sentence in question
- The correct information, with a primary-source link if possible
- Your name (optional, but speeds up response)
We acknowledge correction requests within one business day.
Our response timeline
- Acknowledgement — within 1 business day
- Investigation — within 3 business days for straightforward factual claims; longer for complex or contested ones
- Resolution — within 5 business days, by either publishing a correction, issuing a clarification, or explaining why the original is supported
Correction levels
We use four levels, escalating in severity:
- Typo or formatting fix — silent edit. No on-page notice.
- Clarification— wording was ambiguous; original meaning stands. Published with a “Clarified [date]” line.
- Correction— a factual claim was wrong. Original sentence is replaced; the piece is annotated with a “Corrected [date]: [what changed]” line above the byline.
- Retraction — a claim, section, or entire piece is unsupportable. We replace the body with an explicit retraction notice, keep the URL live, and link to any superseding piece.
Public correction log
Every correction at Level 3 or 4 is logged at /corrections/log with the URL, date, original claim, and correction. This is our public accountability record.
Note: the public log is empty at launch and is populated as corrections are issued.
Right of reply
Subjects of editorial coverage who believe a piece misrepresents them may request a right of reply. Email hello@mindiam.com with the subject Right of reply: [piece title]. We'll respond within 3 business days with a proposed publication path (a quoted statement appended to the piece, a standalone reply piece, or a decline with reasons).
Complaints
If you're unhappy with how a correction was handled, escalate to the founder + editor-in-chief at ben@mindiam.com. If we still can't resolve it, you can take the matter to the relevant Australian regulator — the ACCC for misleading commercial claims, or the OAIC for privacy-related concerns.